Once again, the American right is pushing Israel into a war with Iran

The war hawks should stop playing with Israeli and US lives and give Joe Biden room to secure an agreement that prevents an Iranian bomb

By Joel Rubin
Mar 29, 2023

Israel is mired in an unprecedented domestic political crisis, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreeing to a pause in his push for a deeply polarizing judicial overhaul. While this pause may be temporary, regional challenges to Israeli security are not. Iran’s nuclear stockpile is getting closer to weapons-grade enriched uranium. China just brokered a peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran. And the Palestinian issue remains dangerously unresolved.

Yet instead of recognizing these momentous challenges by calmly backing the Biden Administration’s diplomatic engagements in the region to advance Israeli peace and security, loud voices in Washington are aggressively pressing for Israeli military strikes against Iran.

For the sake of both Israeli and American lives, voices like these should be ignored.

Remember, these are the same mistaken voices who called for the Trump Administration to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which ended up unleashing Iran’s nuclear program and put both Israel and the Middle East at nuclear risk.

We now know that since Trump’s dismantlement of the JCPOA, Iran’s unmonitored nuclear program has accelerated to unprecedented levels and that the regime is roughly 12 days away from nuclear breakout. A diplomatic solution is needed, one that verifiably constrains Iran’s nuclear program. What is not needed are unwise military strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Read also:
Palestinian women prisoners in Israel demand rights on Mother’s Day

These failed results of Trump’s diplomacy-last policy on Iran were predicted and have largely come true, to the detriment of both Israeli and American security, putting us in this fraught situation. Yet instead of recognizing their misfire and changing course, these mistaken voices are doubling down, willing to risk Israeli lives in what would be, according to International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi, an illegal war under international law.

These advocates for Israeli military action against Iran must know how operationally difficult an Israeli strike would be. But they charge ahead, pressuring the Biden Administration to commit to aggressive military backing of Israeli strikes. These hawkish voices apparently have no qualms with sending Israelis, and potentially Americans, to war.

They push this Israel-goes-first attack strategy because they know that Americans won’t politically support another preemptive American war in the Middle East. But without America in the fight, strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities to prevent Iran from ever making the bomb will fail. They know that the US must be part of the military action, so they disingenuously press forward, hoping that Americans would support our ally Israel by joining the fight if it found itself at war.

Compounding this dilemma is the fact that the Israeli political system is in a full-blown crisis. Israeli military leaders have staged a soft revolt against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s anti-democratic judicial coup. Israeli Air Force leaders have refused to conduct drills, and there’s a growing sense amongst the Israeli national security establishment that if Netanyahu were to successfully undermine Israeli democracy, then the integrity and efficacy of the military would be at serious risk.

Read also:
As Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Expands, Israel-Azerbaijan Arms Trade Thrives

Continue reading at blogs.timesofisrael.com

We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers  in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.