NGOs

Le secteur de l’humanitaire, en pleine expansion à cause de la crise profonde que traverse le Liban, est pris dans une contradiction : s’il offre...

24 Feb, 2020 Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reports of Russian airstrikes on two villages in Idlib province have nothing to do with reality, the...

Google: Search Engine or Deep State Organ? By Michael Krieger Today’s post should be read as Part 3 of my ongoing series about the now...

Par Michael Krieger Le 9 aout 2017 Source Liberty Blitzkrieg Ce texte doit être lu comme la  troisième partie de ma série en cours sur le fameux...

By Prof. John McMurtry Within hours of completing an analysis of how the June 8 UK General Election is a fix to lock in a...

Dans ce 30e numéro de la Revue de la semaine, Jean-Luc Mélenchon revient sur la manière dont est traité Emmanuel Macron dans les médias...

But I think it is very important that Russian leaders have in mind the ultimate agenda of this patriarchy in the United States that is one of war, and Donald Trump's mission is to prepare United States for that war and to win. And that is no nice prospect. Russia should not in the slightest instant forget that threat.

In September 2016 it was announced that German chemical & pharmaceutical giant Bayer agreed to buy US seeds and pesticides corporation Monsanto in a $66 billion takeover deal. If the sides finalize the agreement (which is to be signed by the end of 2017) and regulatory authorities in USA and EU approve it, it will create a «transatlantic monster», the likes of which the world has never seen before. The new company will to a great extent dictate to the whole world what to eat, what medicine to take and how to run agriculture.

Last week the U.S. corporation Monsanto, which holds a leading position in the global market of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), reached a licensing agreement with the Broad Institute, Cambridge, USA, on the commercial use of the innovative genome-editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 for agriculture applications. This news has led some experts to

Funded not by the communities they claim to serve, but by these foreign interests, they often operate under the pretext of upholding the legitimate roles and responsibilities of genuine NGOs while in reality undermining a targeted nation's government, its people, its institutions, and national peace and stability. Ironically, such organisations also undermine the perceived legitimacy and effectiveness of real NGOs.