Two thirds prefer to leave their ballots blank or abstain, rather than vote for President Emmanuel Macron. There is still the unknown factor of how many of Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s supporters will vote for the far right.
Supporters of leftist politician Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who came in third in the first round of the French presidential election, have been surveyed about their voting intentions regarding the second round. Consulted, as in 2017, on their choice for the second round, only one third (33.4%) say they will vote for the incumbent, Emmanuel Macron, on Sunday, April 24. The rest of the 215,000 people who took part in the survey will abstain (28.96%) or cast a blank or null ballot (37.65%). Out of consideration for the diversity of the electorate in his La France insoumise (LFI) party, Mr. Mélenchon had limited his voting instructions. On the evening of the first round, he merely said “not one vote for Marine Le Pen,” the far-right Rassemblement National (RN) candidate. Survey organizers said that “the result of this survey is no way an instruction on how to vote. Everyone will decide and vote in conscience, as he intends.”
As was the case five years ago, when Mr. Mélenchon also came in third in the first round, those surveyed were not asked if they would vote for the far-right candidate. At that time, facing a second round between Mr. Macron and Ms. Le Pen, almost two thirds of the insoumis (Mélenchon supporters) polled preferred to vote blank, null or abstain.
These two surveys in 2017 and 2022, which are almost identical, hide the same reality. Namely, it’s that some of Mr. Mélenchon’s votes will go to Ms. Le Pen. According to polls, between 16% and 27% are considering turning to the RN candidate in the second round, against 30% to 40% for President Macron.
We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.