120 Manufacturers in the Global South Could Be Producing mRNA Vaccines If Big Pharma Would Only Show Them How

A new report finds that pharmaceutical monopolies are preventing the production of significant quantities of vaccines in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

By Sarah Lazare

A new report finds that, despite months of claims to the contrary by Big Pharma, at least 120 manufacturers in Africa, Asia and Latin America currently have the capacity to produce mRNA vaccines, but are not doing so because drug companies Pfizer and Moderna are refusing to share technology and information (and governments are not compelling them to). As aĀ result, millions of people across the globe stand to die due to lack of access to vaccines, all because our international system is predicated on pharmaceutical monopolies, not cooperation and knowledgeĀ sharing.

The long list of facilities is the finding of aĀ brief by two healthcare researchers: Achal Prabhala, coordinator of the AccessIBSA project, and Alain Alsalhani, from MĆ©decins Sans FrontiĆØres. In aĀ new paper, they identified 120 global manufacturers ā€‹ā€œwith the technical requirements and quality standards to make mRNA vaccinesā€ā€‰ā€”ā€‰production that would almost certainly dramatically increase the global availability of Covid-19 vaccines and thereby save millions ofĀ lives.

For context, 73 percent of all vaccines that have been administered have gone to wealthy and middle-income countries, while less than 1Ā percent went to the poorest ones. The World Health Organization (WHO) warned on Tuesday that the entire continent of Africa may not attain aĀ 70 percent vaccination level until 2024, all while wealthy nations, including the United States, are moving forward with booster shots for vaccinated individuals. The equitable distribution of mRNA vaccines, in particular, has the potential to reverse thisĀ trend.

Why mRNA vaccines? According to the researchers, ā€‹ā€œUnlike older (pre-2020) vaccine technologies which are cell-based, mRNA vaccines are made through biochemical rather than biological processes. This makes for aĀ simpler system of production, and one that is more predictable and easier to transfer to other manufacturers than previous vaccine technologies.ā€ This means, quite simply, that it takes less time to scale up production. ā€‹ā€œIt takes three to seven days to produce aĀ batch of the active pharmaceutical ingredient for the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine,ā€ the researchers explain, ā€‹ā€œas compared to one month for an equivalent batch of the AstraZenecaĀ vaccine.ā€

Read also:
Trump says American Jews ā€˜either don’t like Israel or don’t care about Israel’

This technology is also the simplest to adapt to new variants, like Omicron, which the WHO has identified as extremely high risk. As Human Rights Watch puts it, ā€‹ā€œThe WHO-listed Covid-19 mRNA vaccines showed great efficacy in clinical trials, and are understood to be among the easiest to modify to target new variants such asĀ Omicron.ā€

Any delay means more lives lost, and the ability to scale up manufacturing rapidly in the Global South could be aĀ game changer for aĀ pandemic that appears nowhere near ending. So, what is the best method for globally distributing mRNA vaccines as quickly as possible? The answer certainly isn’t relying solely on rich countries to make donations, given their dismally poor follow-through in delivering on such pledges. The researchers posit aĀ fairly obvious solution: allow the Global South to unleash its own vaccine manufacturingĀ capacity.

As Paige Oamek and IĀ reported in November, the pharmaceutical industry has long argued that the Global South does not have the ability to rapidly produce mRNA vaccines. ā€‹ā€œThere is no idle mRNA manufacturing capacity in the world. This is aĀ new technology, you cannot go hire people who know how to make mRNA — those people don’t exist,ā€ StĆ©phane Bancel, chief executive of Moderna, said inĀ May.

This line of argument has been used to undermine the case for the temporary suspension of patent rules at the World Trade Organization, aĀ proposal first introduced by India and South Africa in October 2020 (and aggressively opposed by the pharmaceutical industry.) Such aĀ proposal is aimed at dramatically increasing the Global South’s ability to produce generic versions of vaccines, to quickly get them into as many arms as possible. But the pharmaceutical industry has been heavily invested in trying to convince the public and world leaders that suspending patent rules wouldn’t result in increased manufacturing of vaccines, so whyĀ bother?

We now know this pharmaceutical industry talking point is false. AĀ New York Times investigation published in October identified 10 facilities in India, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Argentina and Indonesia that are good candidates for manufacturing mRNA vaccines. Now, the Prabhala and Alsalhani paper, which identifies 120 such facilities,suggests that global vaccine manufacturing capacity is likely far, far higher. This news is not groundbreaking: In September, Indian civil society organizations identified 34 manufacturers in 20 countries likely capable of making the Johnson &Ā Johnson vaccine. But the finding adds urgency to calls for immediately sharing vaccine technology and information with the Global South. It shows our collective capacity to manufacture and distribute mRNA vaccines may be magnitudes greater than our current one, if only we engage in the simple act ofĀ cooperation.

Read also:
Top Military Officers Unload on Trump

First, aĀ note on how the researchers came up with this list: In their paper, they explain that they identified companies that ā€‹ā€œmanufactured sterile injectables and had been certified by aĀ reputable agency or organization for good manufacturing practices.ā€ Eight-two percent of the companies on their list were found by consulting the European Medicines Agency’s EudraGMDP database ā€‹ā€œwhere we found companies who had passed inspection of their facilities for export of aĀ sterile pharmaceutical product to the European Union.ā€ They also looked at approvals from the WHO and U.S. Food and Drug Administration along similar lines, as well as aĀ small number of subsidiaries of Western companies. The researchers reached out to some of these companies in Asia and South Africa and were told that, yes, those companies believe they could quickly develop mRNA vaccine manufacturingĀ capability.

This list was convincing enough to inspire the confidence of Human Rights Watch and MĆ©decins Sans FrontiĆØres, which wrote aĀ joint letter calling on the United States to ā€‹ā€œtransfer technology for Covid-19 vaccines.ā€ The organizations write, ā€‹ā€œThe U.S. government should urgently identify capable manufacturers from these and other lists and ensure that they, along with relevant WHO technology transfer hubs, have timely access to intellectual property, vaccine technology, and materials needed to support manufacturing.ā€ Human Rights Watch and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights also wrote aĀ letter to the German government issuing similar demands. (Germany and the United States both funded the development of mRNAĀ vaccines.)

While the Biden administration has claimed since May to support aĀ patent waiver at the WTO — a mechanism that would allow countries to produce cheaper, generic versions of vaccines — my previous reporting reveals that Biden is not fighting for this measure, and is failing to support the proposal from India and South Africa as it currently stands. This is despite the fact that his administration doubled down on this pledge as recently as November 29, as the Omicron variant stoked fear around theĀ world.

Read also:
Understanding the communist victory in Kerala

In the absence of such aĀ waiver, pharmaceutical companies — loyal, by definition, only to their shareholders — are deciding who lives and who dies. Meanwhile, the unencumbered spread of the disease is giving birth to new, dangerous variants of the virus, including Omicron, something Global South countries have warned would happen. As Luke Savage recently wrote for the Washington Post, ā€‹ā€œThis state of affairs benefits no one, aside from aĀ handful of drugĀ companies.ā€

In the face of aĀ deadly pandemic, we still don’t know what humanity is capable of: how many vaccines we could produce and distribute, or the extent to which we could improve upon the vaccines already in circulation. The greatest possible vaccine doesn’t even exist yet, because Pfizer and Moderna executives are not putting their heads together to figure out how to combine the best attributes of both, in terms of storage, manufacturing ease, or even effectiveness. Our fates have never been more bound together, yet those working on vaccine technology are divided into small silos. And the life-saving vaccines they’re developing — and the knowledge needed to produce them — are being hoarded by wealthy countries, as the global death toll ratchetsĀ up.

As Prabhala and Alsalhani write, ā€‹ā€œWe need to be making billions more doses in order to vaccinate the world. The most effective way to do so would be by diversifying and expanding the manufacture

*Sarah Lazare is web editor and reporter for In These Times. She tweets at @sarahlazare.

Published at inthesetimes.com

We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readersĀ  in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.

Recent Posts